Organization and Social Structure

Description

Social structure and organization encompasses all aspects of society, the economy and even our personal lives. As human beings, we are directly involved in these social structures and organizations from the beginning, starting with the family. We may be born in a hospital, and we may be buried by a funeral society. The school that educates us is an organization, as is the store where we buy our food, the company that makes our car, and the people who collect income tax, collect garbage, and so on. The social structure and organization course is then held to deeply study and critically analyze the closest thing to our daily lives as individuals and societies.

Course Content

  • Establishment of Social organization and structure.
  • Organization and stratification.
  • Keluarga sebagai sebuah organisasi dan struktur sosial.
  • Power and social capital.
  • Social Network Analysis.
  • Organization theory.
  • Types of organizations and social structures.

Reference

Primary Literature

  • Keesing Roger, Felix M. Keesing (1971) New perspectives in cultural anthropology /New York: Holt, Rinchart and Winston.
  • Gibson, J. L., & John Ivancevich, J. D. (2009). Organizations: Behaviour Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw.
  • Elster, J., & Hernes, G. (1986). Stratification and Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Folbre, N., & Bittman, M. (2004). The Social Organization of Care. London: Routledge.
  • Islam, M. S. (2008). Power in Social Organization. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology. Vol.5, No.1 , 1-21.

Supporting Literature

  • Ghoshal, J. N. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 23, No. 2, 242-266.
  • Noel M. Tichy, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social Network Analysis for Organizations. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 4, No. 4, 507-519.
  • Caris, C & Reysnolds S. (2014). Isis Governance in Syria. Institute for the Study of War. 
  • Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, 91-113.
  • Li, T. M. (2007). Govermentality. Anthropologica, Vol. 49, No. 2, 275-281.
  • Gilliespie, S. D. (2000). Rethinking Ancient Maya Social Organization: Replacing “Lineage” with “House”. American Anthropologist, 467-484.
  • Browning, C. R., Feinberg, S., & Dietz, R. D. (2004). The Paradox of Social Organization: Networks, Collective Efficacy, and Violent Crime in Urban Neighborhood. Social Justice, 503-534.

Assessment System

Assessment Matrix

  • attitude 10%
  • Participation 40%
  • Assignment 10%
  • Quiz 10%
  • Midterm Exam 15%
  • Final Exam 15%
  • Peer-Assessment

Peer-Assessment

The percentage of student contribution is taken from the score given by group members to other group members (peer-assessment) regarding the contribution in the process of working on the task from beginning to end.

  • Score 100% if the assessed member fully participates from start to finish
  • Score 75% if the assessed member participates actively, although sometimes less involved
  • Score 50% if the assessed member participates, although often not involved
  • Score 25% if the assessed member only appears at the beginning/middle/end only
  • Score 0% if the assessed member is not involved at all
  • The student contribution percentage score is the total number of peer-assessments divided by the number of group members who were assessed

Students Feedback