Masyarakat dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (CSR)

,

Sekilas

Kode Modul

ANT61133

Total SKS

3

Semester

VII

Frekuensi

Ganjil

Tipe

Perkuliahan

Kuota Kelas

35

Durasi

16 pertemuan

Beban Studi

119 jam

Tatap Muka

35 jam

Mandiri

42 jam

Deskripsi

Program tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan (CSR) sangat berkaitan dengan salah satu bidang dalam keilmuan antropologi, yaitu antropologi terapan. Oleh karena itu isu CSR sangat penting untuk dibahas, oleh karena itu beberapa capaian yang diharapkan dari mata kuliah ini, diantaranya: 1) Menjelaskan apa itu CSR dan bagaimana pembangunan sosial yangdilakukan dapat diimplementasikan dan membawa perubahan dalam kehidupan masyarakat; 2) Menganalisis dinamika CSR menggunakan teori-teori antropologi.

Materi Pembelajaran

  • Ruang lingkup kajian Antropologi CSR.
  • Sejarah dan konsep-konsep dalam praktik CSR.
  • Fenomena komodifikasi CSR dari berbagai kasus.
  • Pola-pola implementasi program CSR melalui studi kasus di Indonesia.
  • Peran CSR dalam relasi korporasi dan masyarakat melalui perspektif moral dan hutang.
  • Praktik tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan dalam mengatasi kemiskinan melalui kasus di India.
  • Politik CSR di Indonesia
  • Politik global dan korporasi melalui proses sertifikasi sawit.
  • Konflik dan praktik corporate security oleh CSR dan masyarakat.
  • Relasi Korporasi (CSR) dan masyarakat adat dalam konflik perebutan sumber daya.
  • Peran dan kontribusi antropologi melalui etnografi CSR

Referensi

Pustaka Utama

  • Carroll, A. B. (2009). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility (A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel, Eds.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
  • McLennan, S., & Banks, G. (2019). Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 117–126.
  • Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (2016). Introduction: Toward the Anthropology of Corporate Social Responsibility. In C. Dolan & D. Rajak (Eds.), The Anthropology of Corporate Social Responsibility (1st ed., pp. 1–28). Berghahn Books.

Pustaka Pendukung

  • Carroll, A. B. (2009). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility (A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel, Eds.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
  • Foster, R. J. (2012). Big men and business: Morality, debt and the corporation A perspective by Robert J. Foster: BIG MEN AND BUSINESS. Social Anthropology, 20(4), 486–490.
  • Raman, K. R. (2007). Community—Coca-Cola Interface: Political-Anthropological Concerns on Corporate Social Responsibility. Social Analysis, 51(3).
  • Trebeck, K. (2009). Corporate responsibility and social sustainability: Is there any connection? In J. Altman & D. Martin (Eds.), Power, Culture, Economy: Indigenous Australians and Mining (1st ed.). ANU Press.
  • Welker, M. A. (2009). “Corporate Security Begins in the Community”: Mining, the Corporate Social Responsibility Industry, and Environmental Advocacy in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 24(1), 142–179.
  • Effendi, A. (n.d.). Factors Affecting CSR Disclosure on Palm Oil Companies in Indonesia. 13.
  • Smith, J. (2010). Flexibility or exploitation? 26(3), 4.
  • Pujiriyani, D. W., & Wahab, O. H. (2013). Kemandegan CSR dan Kontribusinya terhadap Perluasan Konflik Agraria di Kawasan Hutan Register 45 Mesuji. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 17, 18.
  • Shamir, R. (2005). Mind the Gap: The Commodification of Corporate Social Responsibility. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 229–253.
  • Muhammad, S., Radjab, M., & Muhammad, R. (2018). Mitigasi Konflik di Lingkar Tambang: Studi Tentang Kontribusi Program Tanggung Jawab Sosial (CSR) PT. Vale Indonesia di Sorowako. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 4(2).
  • Hidayati, N. D. (2011). Pattern of corporate social responsibility programs: A case study. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 104–117.
  • Ballard, C., & Banks, G. (2003). Resource Wars: The Anthropology of Mining. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 287–313.
  • McLennan, S., & Banks, G. (2019). Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 117–126.
  • Bass, A. E., & Milosevic, I. (2018). The Ethnographic Method in CSR Research: The Role and Importance of Methodological Fit. Business & Society, 57(1), 174–215.
  • Achda, B. T. (2006). The sociological context of corporate social responsibility development and implementation in Indonesia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(5), 300–305.
  • Rosser, A., & Edwin, D. (2010). The politics of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 23(1), 1–22.
  • Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (2016). Introduction: Toward the Anthropology of Corporate Social Responsibility. In C. Dolan & D. Rajak (Eds.), The Anthropology of Corporate Social Responsibility (1st ed., pp. 1–28). Berghahn Books.
  • Swan, N. (2011). Researching sustainable development of the rural poor in India. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2), pp185-194.

Sistem Penilaian

Matrik Penilaian

  • Aktivitas Partisipatif – 10%
  • Hasil Proyek – 40%
  • Kuis – 10%
  • Tugas – 10%
  • UTS – 15%
  • UAS – 15%

Umpan Balik Mahasiswa

UNDUH RPS LENGKAP