Etika Profesi
Sekilas
Kode Modul
SAB60103
Total SKS
3
Semester
V
Frekuensi
Ganjil
Tipe
Perkuliahan
Kuota Kelas
35
Durasi
16 pertemuan
Beban Studi
119 jam
Tatap Muka
35 jam
Mandiri
42 jam
Deskripsi
Setelah menempuh matakuliah Etika Profesi, mahasiswa dapat memahami, menerapkan konsep dan prinsip-prinsip kode etik dalam masyarakat
Materi Pembelajaran
- Mahasiswa mampu memahami konsep dasar Etika Profesi
- Mahasiswa dapat menerapkan teknik studi kritis terhadap fenomena-fenomena penegakkan dan pelanggaran etika profesi
- Mahasiswa dapat menerapkan teknik penulisan hasil studi kritis atas fenomena etika profesi
- Mahasiswa dapat melaksanakan teknik penelitian lapangan dan menganalisis data -data studi kritis tentang etika profesi
Referensi
Pustaka Utama
- https://books.google.com/books/about/Virtue_Ethics.html?id=j9ZiDwAAQBAJ&source=kp_cover
- https://www.routledge.com/Moral-Teleology-A-Theory-of-Progress/Sauer/p/book/9781032451800
- https://www.academia.edu/49118346/Teori_teori_Etika
Pustaka Pendukung
- https://scholar.google.co.id/scholarq=Customer+Satisfaction,+Employee+Engagement+and+Development,+Innovation,+Social+Responsibility+and+Financial+Strength&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
- Wrzesniewski, Amy, 2003. “Finding positive meaning in work” (2003)
- Wolfe, Alan, 1997. “The Moral Meaning of Work” (1997)
- Wulff, Kristin; Finnestrand, Hanne. 2023. “Creating meaningful work in the age of AI: explainable AI, explainability, and why it matters to organizational designers” (2023)
- Wright, Scott A; Schultz, Ainslie E, 2018. “The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework” (2018)
- Williams, Colin C; Windebank, Jan, 2002. Informal Employment in Advanced Economies: Implications for Work and Welfare (2002)
- West, Darrell M. 2018. The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation (2018)
- American Anthropological Asociation (AAA)
- The ‘problem’ of ethics in contemporary anthropological research By John R. Campbell (School of Oriental and African Studies)
- Anthropologists only Need Apply: Challenges of Applied Anthropology, Paul Sillitoe, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Mar., 2007), pp. 147-165 (19 pages) Published By: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland
- https://www.jstor.org/stable/24397421
- Anthropology_of_Education_Discourses_and_Dilemmas_in_Analysis_of_Educational_Patterns_and_Cultural_Configurations_towards_Pursuit_of_Quality_Education
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/29456605_Anthropology_and_Tourism_Past_Contributions_and_Future_Theoretical_Challenges
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346221501_Toward_an_anthropology_of_health_care_value_Including_the_voice_of_lifeworld_in_healthcare_policies
- https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/aa.1979.81.3.02a00010
Sistem Penilaian
Matrik Penilaian
- Aktivitas Partisipatif 10 %
- Project based 40%
- Quis 10%
- UTS 20 %
- UAS 20 %
Peer-Assessment
Persentase kontribusi mahasiswa diambil dari nilai yang diberikan anggota kelompok kepada anggota kelompok yang lain (peer-assesment) terkait kontribusi dalam proses pengerjaan tugas dari awal hingga akhir.
- Skor 100% jika anggota yang dinilai berpartisipasi penuh dari awal hingga akhir
- Skor 75% jika anggota yang dinilai berpartisipasi aktif meski beberapa kali kurang terlibat
- Skor 50% jika anggota yang dinilai berpartisipasi meski sering tidak terlibat
- Skor 25% jika anggota yang dinilai hanya muncul di awal/tengah/akhir saja
- Skor 0% jika anggota yang dinilai tidak terlibat sama sekali
- Nilai persentase kontribusi mahasiswa adalah jumlah total penilaian peer-assesment dibagi jumlah anggota kelompok yang menilai.
Umpan Balik Mahasiswa
![](https://antropologi-fib.ub.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Course-Questionnaire-Survey-Result_page-0040-1024x576.jpg)